my stance on war Essay Example

my stance on war Essay English 101 Evils of Wars Wars break out for various reasons. There are wars between countries or nations and within the nation. The latter is generally known as a civil war and can occur as a result of differences based on race, religion, socio-economic dissatisfaction among others. Whether wars are waged between countries (interstate) or inside the country between different sections of the communities, the effects are very damaging. There are a number of viewpoints for deciding when war is appropriate, some based on morals, and some based on costs and benefits. There are four theories that serve as justification for violence and wars. The main theories that explain policy decisions about war and peace are the theories of realism, pacifism, Just-war, and the requirement of discrimination theory. l, of course, dont support the idea that war is necessary because it destroys innocent minds, it is bad for the economy, and it is terrible for the environment. War does not always physically injure someone, but it can emotionally scar them for the rest of their lives. First, one thing that we can learn rom war is the recognition of universal similarities. Oftentimes, the soldiers are constantly told that the enemy are beasts and deserve no reason to live. But what makes the enemy different from them? Both sides believe in fighting for the homeland. Also, both sides encounter the destruction that a war brings to soldier mentally and physically. In the book All Quiet on the Western Front, author Erich Maria Remarque explains how even though in war the soldiers may have survived the attacks, they did not always survive the war itself(23). We will write a custom essay sample on my stance on war specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on my stance on war specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on my stance on war specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer By this statement, Remarque is trying to inform readers that war has negative effects on people, not only physically but also mentally. War destroys innocence. Soldiers in the war never had a chance to live their youth because they had to go to war. Just as they should be starting their teenage years, they were forced to drop everything at once and put their life on the line. If war does not kill you physically, then it will emotionally. Its a simple fact; war is destruction at its best. It does not only destroy lives and emotions, but the economy as well. War has influenced economic history profoundly across time and space. Above all, recurring war has drained wealth, disrupted markets, and depressed economic growth. Wars are expensive in money and other resources. In the book The Real Price of War: How You Pay for the War on Terror, author Joshua S. Goldstein informs that one estimate put World War Is total cost at $400 billion five times the value of everything in France and Belgium at the time(14). Goldsteins point is that in order to maintain a war and be fully prepared for it, a single country will eed to spend billions of dollars on weapons, food, shelter, training, etc. Yet many people might believe that it is worth it to squander billions of dollars Just to kill innocent people, and destroy countries, I think it is an aimless action to act upon. One way governments pay for war is to raise taxes, which is non-beneficial to society. Another way to pay for war is to borrow money, which increases government debt and can drive states into bankruptcy. In addition to draining money and resources capital such as farms, factories, and cities. Throughout history, war has invariably resulted in environmental destruction. Nuclear weapons pose a terrible threat to the environment and human health. The earths environment is battered by war, its preparation, practice and aftermath. It is destroyed as an act of war; it is used as a weapon of war; and its destruction is expensive and sometimes irreversible. In the article The Aftermath of Invasion: A Field Report from Nasiriyah, author Norman Sheehan stated that during the most recent warfare in Iraq, individuals were forced o cut down city trees to use as cooking fuel(1 1). This statement, which Sheehan uses in his article, adds weight to the argument that war destroys the environment. Cutting down trees has many negative effects on the environment, animals, and people. The real risk that conventional weapons pose to the environment is through indirect effects. For example, war affects the quality of our air; emissions from the use of tanks and other military machinery and the use of air bombs leave chemicals and debris in the air, which results in inhaling chemicals that are dangerous for our body. The start of a war only leads to harmful and negative outcomes. There is no doubt that war is an evil one, and it should never occur in history because it destroys innocence, it is bad for the economy, and it is terrible for the environment. There are, doubtless, people who consider war as something grand and heroic and regard it as something that brings out the best man. But this does not in any way alter the fact that war is a terrible dreadful calamity. This topic matters to the world because, us, people need to put ourselves first and think about how much we are going to be ffected when a war breaks down. In one way or another, everyone is affected by war. Therefore, starting a war should never be an option in solving disputes. Works Cited Goldstein, Joshua S. The Real Price of War: How You Pay for the War on Terror. New York: New York UP, 2004. Print. Remarque, Erich Maria, and A. W. Wheen. All Quiet on the Western Front. Boston: Little, Brown, and, 1929. Print. Sheehan, Norman. The Aftermath of Invasion: A Field Report from Nasiriyah. Environmentalists Against War. Environmentalists Against War, 01 May 2003. Web. 06 Nov. 2013.

State vs.Church essays

State vs.Church essays The United States of America has remained a successful and industrious nation ruled by the principles of federalism for the past 200 years. The Framers of the Constitution proposed the federal system in an attempt to guarantee democracy and liberty throughout a sparsely populated nation. By granting enumerated powers to the national government and reserving all other rights to the states, a balance of power was obtained and continues to rule this great country. The relations between the national and state governments have been a central feature of American politics. With the adoption of the Constitution in 1787, America encountered a persistent controversy that has been the source of political disagreement. Ever since the framers of the Constitution were busy working on this important document, they found themselves torn between two views of what federalism meant. A famous American statesman known as Alexander Hamilton argued for a powerful national government. He believed that because people had created the national government, and since the most pressing needs were the development of a national economy and the conduct of foreign affairs, the superiority of a central authority had to be recognized. However, defending the states rights was Thomas Jefferson who believed that although the people were the ultimate sovereigns, the principal threat to their liberties was likely to come from the national government. Consequently, Jefferson felt the powers of the federal government needed to be strictly limited. As a result of geography and populace distribution, a representative democracy was established. This system corresponded with a federal republic. Through Federalism, localities across America are all capable of responding adequately to the desires of their citizens. Governments are more flexible and therefore respond appropriately to peoples needs. The division of powers between states and the federal gov...

Andy Warhol's Pop Art Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Andy Warhol's Pop Art - Research Paper Example The paper "Andy Warhol's Pop Art" states the primary sources of Andy Warhol's pop art. The world of fashion in New York and internationally were interwoven with the fine art crowd of museums. Artists, models, young actors and actresses, musicians, and all manner of up and coming celebrities were pictured in Andy Warhol’s diary. Warhol’s language is like gossip when he describes the scenes, scandals, cliques, and conversations that occur in his presence involving some of the most famous names in pop culture. Mick Jagger, Bianca Jagger, Halston, Basquiat, Lou Reed, Nico, and others are favorites as he attends parties on the Upper East Side of Manhattan featuring all of the wealth and luxury of the entertainment world. Warhol clearly understood the path to celebrity and struggled to achieve that in his life. Hacket writes: â€Å"Every night, celebrities of the art, fashion, music, and ‘underground’ filmmaking crowds jammed themselves into favorite corners of the back room at Max’s and monitored each other’s clothes, makeup, wit, and love interests while they received ‘exchange’ celebrities from out of town—directors and producers from Europe or Hollywood—and waited to be taken away from ‘all this’ (New York notoriety) and put into ‘all that’. Andy’s art hung on the wall.† Thus, if every artist must be supported and reflective of a larger culture, than Warhol’s closest identity is to this Upper East Side Manhattan and Greenwich Village crowd of young bohemians, artists, models, and actresses., all of whom shared the career goals of Warhol of attaining celebrity status through their self-expression. Warhol’s art becomes more â€Å"universal† and American when it symbolizes a superficial culture, pop culture, where everybody has 15 minutes of fame. Fame is an integral part of art and art history as it is known in modern times, because if an artist is not famous, his or her work will not be printed, distributed, and known. If the artist is not famous, it will have no influence on other artists and vanish, no matter its beauty or technical excellence. Warhol’s art is conceptual and uses silk-screens of sampled images taken from photographs, or copied from print and television advertisements. Warhol himself may only paint a few details of